Text
1. The plaintiff (appointed)'s claims are all dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be the part resulting from the participation.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The F Area Housing Reconstruction Project Promotion Committee (hereinafter “instant promotion committee”) that falls under the overall transfer of the Defendant joining the Defendant (hereinafter “instant promotion committee”) was organized with the purpose of implementing the housing reconstruction improvement project (hereinafter “instant improvement project”) on December 29, 2006, by designating the rearrangement zone on December 24, 2009, the size of which was reduced to 23,260 square meters (hereinafter “instant improvement zone”); and was approved by the Defendant (hereinafter “instant promotion committee approval disposition”).
B. On June 18, 2012, the instant promotion committee obtained the consent of 184 owners of the land, etc. in the instant improvement zone (160 owners of housing and land, incidental welfare facilities, and 24 landowners) and applied for authorization to establish the Defendant’s Intervenor (hereinafter “application for authorization to establish the Defendant’s Intervenor”). The Defendant calculated the number of owners of land, etc. in the instant improvement zone as 186 owners, etc. in the instant improvement zone, at least 142 persons (76.34%) who were at least 3/4 of the number of owners of land, etc. in the instant improvement zone, and agreed to the establishment of the Defendant’s Intervenor on July 20, 2012 (hereinafter “application for authorization to establish the Defendant’s establishment”).
C. On September 5, 2012, some owners of land, etc. within the instant rearrangement zone, including the Plaintiff (appointed parties; hereinafter “Plaintiffs”) filed an administrative appeal with the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Administrative Appeals Commission seeking approval for the composition of the instant promotion committee and confirmation of invalidity of the preceding approval. The Seoul Special Metropolitan City Administrative Appeals Commission (hereinafter “Administrative Appeals Commission”) on January 14, 2013, in order to issue the authorization for the establishment of the Intervenor’s Intervenor, it must obtain consent from at least 3/4 of all “owners of land and buildings, landowners, and building owners.” The instant promotion committee is limited to land and building owners.