logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2017.01.05 2016고단1018
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2016 Highest 1018"

1. On August 2015, the Defendant, along with his accomplice D (the whereabouts at present) who is an accomplice, purchased a vehicle under the name of the person in need of supply by preparing an office of “F” in the Seodaemun-gu Office E, Daegu, and purchased the vehicle. After obtaining a loan from the lending company as collateral, the Defendant intended to acquire the loan by means of voluntary disposal of the vehicle and non-performance of the loan. On August 20, 2015, the Defendant offered the above D and the above D co-offender I (the guilty verdict of the first instance on May 13, 2016, and continuing the appellate trial) and B, the Defendant purchased the vehicle under his name and applied for the loan by acquiring the vehicle under the name of his/her own account and by acquiring the said vehicle under the name of the lending company as collateral.

Accordingly, the defendant from August 2015 to the end of the same year.

9. By February 2, 200, the said I instructed the said I to order the said I to “I to write the loan application as if the Defendant works in the J,” and the said D prepared the account transaction details stating the false content that the said I had been paid monthly salary from the said J. On September 2, 2015, the said I purchased M rocketing car at the 6th selling store of a private person in the middle and middle in the Seogu, Daegu, Daegu, and then submitted a letter of loan to the employee of the damage company OF bank “I will receive loans of KRW 15 million as collateral and repay each 477,710 won each month for 48 months.”

However, the above I was a person who did not have worked in the above J and did not have the intent or ability to repay the loan even if the injured company received the loan from the injured company, and the defendant was well aware of the fact, and the above car was from the above I.

arrow