1. The Defendant’s disposition of non-approval of medical care for official duties rendered on February 8, 2018 is revoked.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. At around 6:50 on November 10, 2017, the Plaintiff was a police official who works as a professor at B school, and was at the shower room at B school, who was suffering from the respiratory difficulty, chest satis, satisf, and satisf, and was at home at around 7:50 on November 13, 2017, the Plaintiff was at home and was at home to work at his home at the hospital, and was at home after receiving a diagnosis of “unsatisfic sofacsatisfacsatisf,” and applied for approval of medical care for official duties to the Defendant.

B. In full view of the medical records and the medical opinions of the pertinent disease, the Defendant: (a) was known as a disease that occurred in the heart due to a narrow cause, such as the cryposis, cryposis, blood transfusion, and salvosis; and (b) the elderly, smoking, high blood pressure, urology, vision, shortage of movement, etc.; and (c) according to the health care benefit content of the National Health Insurance Act, the Plaintiff continued to receive medical treatment by the time of diagnosis in 2008 to 2017, with high blood pressure, and other unknown primary high blood pressure; and (d) it is difficult to recognize that there was no reasonable causal link between the Plaintiff’s health examination results of the health examination in 2014 and 2016, on the ground that there was no excessive causal link between the Plaintiff’s duty and the Plaintiff’s duty occurring during the 8-month period; and (b) it appears that it is difficult to view that there was no reasonable causal link between the Plaintiff’s duty and the Plaintiff’s duty.