The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the reasons for appeal is too unreasonable (six months of imprisonment).

2. A favorable circumstance is that the Defendant recognized the instant facts charged and reflected, and that there was an agreement with the victim interfering with business affairs, etc.

However, the crime of this case is deemed to interfere with the duty of the Defendant without any particular reason by force, such as a bridge B B B, and thereby causing damage to public goods without being involved in the Defendant’s duty and without being arrested by a police officer. In full view of the various circumstances revealed in the records and arguments of this case, including the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, family relationship, motive and circumstance of the crime, means and consequence of the crime, etc., as well as the fact that the crime of this case was committed during the period of suspension of execution due to a special intimidation, etc., the crime of this case was committed during the period of suspension of execution. There is no reason to view that the sentence imposed by the lower court is appropriate, and that the lower court’s judgment on the sentencing exceeded the reasonable limit of discretion, or that it is unreasonable to maintain it as it is.

Therefore, since the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.