logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2019.03.28 2018구단76500
난민불인정결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea on June 5, 2017 with the status of stay C-3 (short-term visit) status as a foreigner of the nationality of the Republic of ASEAN (Federia, hereinafter “ASEAN”).

B. On June 15, 2017, the Plaintiff filed an application for recognition of refugee status with the Defendant, but the Defendant, on February 27, 2018, issued a disposition for recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) to the Plaintiff on the ground that it is difficult to recognize “the well-founded fear of persecution” as prescribed by Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Convention”) and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Protocol”) and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Protocol”).

C. On March 21, 2018, the Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice against the instant disposition. However, the Minister of Justice dismissed the Plaintiff’s objection on the same ground as on November 29, 2018.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2 and 4, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff's assertion is a senior to a senior to a senior to a senior to a senior to a senior to a senior to a senior to a senior to a senior to a senior to an

The plaintiff's father and mother are all woodens, and the plaintiff's family were residing in the village of "B" located in Kaduna (Kaduna) State.

Many of the village residents were Muslim, but since 2016, he sent a text message to the effect that he did not hold a church to the plaintiff's her 's 's 's 's 's 's 's '' and that the church building is also removed'.

Around December 2016, the Plaintiff’s references neglected such a intimidation text messages, and a majority of his/her natives living together with the Plaintiff’s family members committed an attack, and during that process, the Plaintiff’s parents and female students were killed.

At the time, the plaintiff is a citizen of the Henmanar.

arrow