logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2013.12.20 2013고단1462
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

The defendant shall pay 2,454,940 won to the applicant by fraud.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【Before the latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for one year and two months at the Gwangju District Court on March 14, 2013 and eight months, and the judgment became final and conclusive on July 15, 2013.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Around October 22, 2012, the victim C-related Defendant stated that “A victim C, an employee of the said store, is using a Handphone store in another area, and if a copy of the resident registration certificate is brought to a copy of the Handphone, the victim C-related Defendant would have no absolute damage on the part of the driver, and would offer the benefit further.”

However, the defendant did not operate a mobile phone store, and did not have any intention to cancel the mobile phone within two weeks, and he tried to open the mobile phone using a copy of the resident registration certificate obtained from the victim C and sell it to the mobile phone purchaser and acquire the price by fraud.

The Defendant deceptions the victim C as such, and thereafter, purchased a copy of the victim E, F, G, and H’s resident registration certificate at around that time from the victim C, and thereafter sold the mobile phone in the name of the victims, and sold the same amount of 3,313,830 won to the victim C, and the Defendant exempted the victim E from paying the price, thereby obtaining pecuniary benefits equivalent to the same amount of 3,51,480 won, and the Defendant exempted the victim E from paying the price. The Defendant charged the victim F with the mobile phone fee of 2,280,50 won to the victim F, who was exempted from paying the price, and the Defendant charged the victim with the mobile phone fee of 1,597,800 won to the victim G, and the Defendant exempted the victim G from paying the price, and the amount equivalent to the same amount of monetary benefits.

arrow