logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2021.02.17 2020가단5178693
손해배상(기)
Text

All of the claims filed by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and the counterclaim claims by the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) are dismissed.

(b) Costs of lawsuit;

Reasons

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

1. Basic facts

A. On November 25, 2018, the Plaintiff and the Defendant, via a marriage information company, were engaged in franchising from the beginning of December of the same year, at least four to five times a week from the beginning of the first month of the same year, or engaged in franchising along with a tourist, Incheon, and Turkey.

B. After having become aware of the Plaintiff’s pregnancy on January 7, 2019, the Defendant: (a) had the Plaintiff engage in a dispute; and (b) had the Plaintiff continued contact with each other; (c) on February 7, 2019, the Plaintiff was a miscarriage.

(c)

On March 13, 2019, the Plaintiff sent to the C elementary school principal room working for the Defendant by a content-proof mail that “the Defendant had raped the Plaintiff, attempted to murder, attempted to do so, and abused language and assaulted.”

(d)

After all, the plaintiff filed a complaint with an investigative agency on charges of rape, but the defendant was not subject to disposition of non-prosecution on July 31, 2019.

【Unsatisfy-founded facts, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 10, Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 3, 9, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the claim on the principal lawsuit

가. 원고의 주장 ㈎ 피고는 2018. 12. 9., 같은 달 10. 및 같은 달 15. 등에 결혼 중개소를 통해 만난 지 얼마 안되는 원고를 피고의 집안으로 유인한 후, 결혼하자는 등의 말을 하며 원고를 강압적으로 간음하였고, 2019. 1. 6. 춘천 소양강 댐 근처에서 어깨를 강하게 밀치는 등으로 원고를 폭행하여 원고로 하여금 임신한 아이를 유산하게 하였다.

㈏ 원고는 피고의 위와 같은 혼인 빙 자 간음, 강간, 강제 추행, 폭행 등으로 인하여 큰 육체적, 정신적 고통을 겪었으므로, 피고는 원고에게 위자료 3,000만 원 및 이에 대한 지연 손해금을 지급할 의무가 있다.

B. The Plaintiff’s assertion and the evidence presented by the Plaintiff alone are insufficient to recognize that the Defendant committed sexual intercourse, rape, forced indecent act, and assault against the Plaintiff in the process of marriage, as alleged by the Plaintiff. This is different.

arrow