beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant was the head of the D Management Department in Daegu Northern-gu C.
E, which has operated the above ethcop, filed a claim for damages against D's owner F for the wrongful destruction of the lease agreement against the ethrpcop. (Tgu District Court 2015 group 16313).
On January 15, 2016, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the above damages lawsuit in the Daegu Suwon-gu District Court 305, Daegu-gu District Court 305, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, 2016, and testified after being present in the court as a witness of the above damages lawsuit, upon receipt of the F’s agent’s presentation of the lease agreement (Evidence A 1) and “The lease agreement is due.”
The plaintiff (E) responded to the question of "", and "the plaintiff (E) has a staff member in charge of the gypt and moved to an intersection of the instant marina, such as a Japan, which was kept in custody in the instant marina.
The answer was made as “for example” to the question “.”
However, in fact, the defendant did not memory the above lease contract until the testimony was made, and whether or not he moved to the lane of the fruit stuff, etc. being kept in D., or there was no memory.
Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Statement made by the police for E;
1. Recording book (the sequence 3 of the evidence list);
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each recording recording (the No. 5,9 of the evidence list);
1. Article 152 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 152 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;
1. Articles 153 and 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act to be mitigated by law;
1. The crime of perjury by the accused for the reason of sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, which undermine the judicial function, is not good. However, there is no record that the accused has been punished for the same kind of crime, and before the judgment on the damages lawsuit between E and F becomes final and conclusive, the favorable circumstances such as the accused’s age, sexual behavior, environment, and motive for the crime.