A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant has been punished twice as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (driving) by receiving a summary order of KRW 1.5 million on December 8, 2008 from the Daegu District Court, and a summary order of KRW 3 million on June 27, 2014 from a fine of KRW 3 million on June 27, 2014.

1. Around 21:50 on April 23, 2019, the Defendant was under the influence of the alcohol level of 0.165% (in the application of the Tramark Nommark Nommark), and made the front of the solar distance turn from the c apartment to the mountain direction at the west of Daegu Northern-gu.

At the time, the surface was slick because it was difficult to slick, and the traffic islands located at the center of the road with signal lights and safety fences installed on the traffic islands, so the Defendant, who is engaged in driving duty, has a duty of care to see well the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and to make a left-hand turn safely

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant failed to operate the brake system properly and failed to turn to the left without properly operating it, and received the victim Daegu Provincial Police Agency’s signal lights installed in the traffic island and the safety fences in the construction and management of the victim Daegu Northern-gu Office.

As a result, the Defendant, by its occupational negligence, destroyed the signal, etc. of the management of the Daegu Provincial Police Agency for Victims to take repair costs equivalent to KRW 1,570,00,00, and, at the same time, destroyed the safety fences of the construction and management of the Daegu Northern-gu Office for Victims to take necessary measures, such as immediately stopping and preventing risks on the road, even though the Defendant destroyed the safety fences equivalent to KRW 1,680,00

2. A violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) even though the Defendant had been in violation of the provision on prohibition of drinking under the Road Traffic Act two times or more, the Defendant is in accordance with the provision on prohibition of drinking under the Road Traffic Act, and at the time stated in paragraph (1).