beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is a citizen of Gangnam-si D, and a person who was signed by 150 residents opposing the additional development of the mine E Co., Ltd. (F) which is a neighboring mining business entity around August 2014 and submitted it to the Gangseo-si State Forest Management Office, which is the competent authority in charge of mining development.
From August 2014 to November 201 of the same year, the Defendant met F, the representative of the above corporation E, and the Defendant acted as the representative of the opposing residents, and directly controlled the conditions of withdrawal of civil petitions for mine development. Since around November 2014, F promised to deposit KRW 40 million with G G account established by the Defendant on the condition of withdrawal of existing civil petitions and deposit of KRW 40 million with G account established by the Defendant on the condition of withdrawal of existing civil petitions. As such, the Defendant had the original copy of the opposite signature document submitted by the Defendant at the time of receipt of the existing civil petition, by changing the content of the document as the withdrawal of civil petitions and the consent for mine development, and let F keep it up to F.
1. The Defendant forged a private document: (a) there was no consent from the residents of the Republic of Korea to withdraw his/her opposing intent by preparing a signature of the dissenting opinion in the vicinity of the U.S. Gyeong-si between November 2014 and December 8, 2014; and (b) there was no consent from the Defendant to withdraw his/her opposing intent.
H and other D residents’ 150 original text of “written signature in opposition to the development activities of mines” consisting of 150 original text of “written signature in opposition to the development activities of mines,” and copied only the part in which the names, addresses, signatures or seals of the Signatories are written, using a uniform fraud, and then, on December 8, 2014, at the E Office of Gangseo-si I Co., Ltd., the document was attached to F’s opinion and written consent.
Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a “resident’s opinion and written consent” in the name of 150 persons, such as H, which is a private document related to rights and obligations.
2. The Defendant shall exercise the above investigation document on January 2, 2014.