The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is as follows: (a) the Defendant reported the situation of the victim's vehicle behind the victim's vehicle, followed the victim by warning the situation; and (b) proceeded with the victim immediately after passing the vehicle without any special reason; and (c) it is reasonable to deem that such act was an act of notifying the victim of the harm sufficient to cause fear to the victim; and (d) the Defendant has the intent of special intimidation.

Nevertheless, the lower court rendered a not guilty verdict on this part of the facts charged, which erred by misapprehending the facts and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. Determination

A. The summary of the facts charged in this part is a person who is engaged in driving a vehicle BAD A7 passenger cars (hereinafter “Defendant’s vehicle”).

On June 26, 2019, the Defendant followed the Do-dong Park, the Do-dong Park, the Do-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong, the Defendant

The Defendant: (a) obstructed the center line on the ground that the victim D ( South, the age of 31) driven by E C (hereinafter referred to as “victim’s car”) driven by the Defendant driven by the Defendant, while driving a 100-meter road adjacent to the 100-meter road; (b) threatened the victim’s driver’s vehicle in the middle of the 100-meter section after entering the future, and threatened the victim by interfering with the operation.

In this respect, the defendant carried a dangerous object, and threatened the victim.

B. The lower court determined that the Defendant’s vehicle following the victim’s vehicle at the time of the instant case was overtaken by the victim’s vehicle after the Defendant’s vehicle was driven by the victim’s vehicle at the time of the instant case at the time of the instant case at the time, raising the border, etc., and followed the victim’s vehicle at the time before the victim’s vehicle. However, it is recognized that the victim was threatened by the victim’s vehicle at the time

The above section states that the speed of the limit is 20 km/h, and it is narrow that it is adjacent to the mountain.