logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2018.09.19 2018고단307
도로교통법위반(음주측정거부)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 15, 2017, the Defendant: (a) driven a drinking, such as drinking, such as drinking, by making a drick on the front of the “C” vehicle located in Gyeonggi-gu B, Gyeonggi-do, and stopping on the center line, and opening a tring line, and driving a drinking boat; (b) the Defendant dracks the vehicle on the front of the “C” vehicle located in Gyeonggi-gu, Gyeonggi-do; and (c) driving the drinking by drinking as a result of the measurement of the reduction of drinking.

인 정할 만한 상당한 이유가 있어 양 평 경찰서 E 파출소 소속 경사 F으로부터 음주 측정기에 입김을 불어넣는 방법으로 음주 측정요구를 받았으나 이를 거부하고, 이로 인해 현행범 체포되어 양 평 경찰서 양 평 파출소로 연행된 후 다시 22:50 경, 22:57 경, 23:02 경 3회에 걸쳐 음주 측정요구를 받았으나 측정기에 입을 대고 바람을 넣지 않고 시늉만 하는 등 정당한 사유 없이 경찰공무원의 음주 측정 요구에 응하지 아니하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness G;

1. Notification of the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. According to the evidence adopted and examined by this court on November 15, 2017, the Defendant refused to comply with the measurement upon receiving a request for the measurement of alcohol from G during the police box on the road as indicated in the judgment of this court around November 22:37, 2017, and refused to comply with the measurement. After being accompanied by the police box on three occasions as indicated in the judgment, the Defendant was subject to the alcohol measurement on three occasions, but the Defendant was notified that he was finally refused the alcohol measurement at around November 23:37, 2017 (the Defendant was aware that the measurement was conducted normally, and if the result was not found, he was unable to comply with the measurement even though the police officer in charge was able to normally measure the alcohol, but the written statement submitted by the Defendant to the investigative agency by himself was not made by the Defendant.

arrow