logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2013.03.22 2013고단393
특정범죄자에대한보호관찰및전자장치부착등에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 14, 2010, the Defendant is a person who was sentenced to two years and six months of imprisonment due to a crime of violation of the Act on the Punishment of Sexual Crimes and the Protection of Victims, etc., and was subject to a disposition of medical treatment and custody at a public medical treatment and custody center on August 29, 201, and was subject to a decision of provisional termination of medical treatment and custody and a decision of electronic device attachment for three years at the Medical Treatment and Custody Deliberation Committee on September 5, 201 after the provisional termination of medical treatment and custody and the provisional termination of medical treatment and custody on September 5, 201, and is equipped with an electronic device after the completion of the execution of the sentence in the public medical treatment and custody center at the public medical treatment and custody

On February 20, 2013, at around 10:34, the Defendant maintained the utility of the Defendant by cutting the electronic device with gate in the Defendant’s residence located under C underground 1, Hanam-si, Gyeonggi-do.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written decision on attaching an electronic device;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing damaged electronic device photographs;

1. Article 38 and Article 14 (1) of the Act on Probation and Electronic Monitoring, etc. of Specific Criminal Offenders who have the option to commit a crime;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentencing grounds of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act Article 334(1) of the provisional payment order is recognized by the defendant, and depth is reflected, and the defendant seems to have committed the instant crime by contingency, and the punishment is determined as ordered in consideration of all the circumstances.

arrow