Text
1. The judgment of the first instance, including the Plaintiff’s claim expanded and added by this court, shall be modified as follows.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. At around 19:30 on December 24, 2015, the Defendant: (a) driven the Jinju Civil Bus, which was driven by C in order to get passengers to get off the front road in front of the Gu court in the front of the city bus stop at the front of the city bus stop in order to get passengers to get off from the front of the city bus at the front of the city of Jinju-si; and (b) in such a case, the bus driver neglected his/her duty of care to safely drive the bus by opening the door accurately so as not to fall off the passengers getting off or getting off the bus while neglecting his/her duty of care; and (c) did not look at the passengers getting off the bus properly, and the Plaintiff, who was driven from the said urban bus due to the negligence that began with the back of the city bus open, lost balance
(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”) B.
On March 11, 2016, the Defendant’s above criminal facts were issued a summary order of KRW 700,000 as the Jinwon District Court Branch Branch Decision 2016Gohap225, and the said summary order was finalized on April 16, 2016.
C. The Federation of the Korea Bus Transport Business Association, which entered into a mutual aid agreement with the Jinju Civil Bus Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Nonindicted Co., Ltd.”) working for the Defendant, paid KRW 897,800 in total as the Plaintiff’s medical expenses from January 22, 2016 to March 10, 2016. On December 29, 2015, the Plaintiff paid KRW 700,000 to the Plaintiff as damages.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence No. 1, Eul evidence No. 2, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Determination
A. According to the facts of the recognition of the above liability for damages, the defendant is liable for damages sustained by the plaintiff due to the accident in this case as a bus driver.
On December 29, 2015, the defendant paid 700,000 won to the above mutual aid association representing the non-party company, who is the defendant's employer, as damages for the accident of this case, and renounced all rights arising from the accident of this case, and decided not to raise any civil or criminal objection in the future.