The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The Defendant’s assertion of unreasonable sentencing regarding the Defendant’s assertion of unfair sentencing may be considered as having acknowledged the Defendant’s crime, against the mistake, and cooperated in the investigation, and the Defendant has no previous conviction except for one-time fine due to the crime committed on the basis of this type of crime. However, the instant crime is heavy as the object of speculation and damaging the purpose of the public rental housing business system, and the Defendant’s gains acquired by the instant crime are significant; the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, family environment, background and consequence of the instant crime; and all of the sentencing conditions indicated in the instant records and arguments, such as the circumstances before and after the crime, etc., are considered to be appropriate and too unreasonable.

2. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.