logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전고등법원 2018.07.06 2018노181
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(장애인강간)
Text

The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Sexual assault against the defendant for 40 hours.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts and improper sentencing);

A. The Defendant was unaware of the fact that he did not commit rape, and did not know the victim’s disability.

B. The sentencing of the court below (the order to complete sexual assault treatment programs with 3 years and 6 months and 40 hours of imprisonment) is too unreasonable even if the defendant's act of sentencing is found guilty.

2. Determination

A. Determination 1 on the assertion of fact misunderstanding 1) When determining the credibility of a statement made by an investigative agency as evidence is submitted, considering the child’s age, how much the child’s age is, how much after the occurrence of the case, how much the child was made after the occurrence of the case, and how much the guardian or investigator who first heard the facts damaged by the child during the process of making the statement after the occurrence of the case, and inducing the child to make a specific answer through a repetitive interrogation, etc., whether there is room to cause a harm to the child memory. Whether there is room for a harm to the child’s memory, whether the above statement was not repeatedly made by the questioner, whether it was affected by another child’s statement made at the time of the above statement, whether the interview was affected by the questioner, whether the child’s statement made at the time of the interview was affected by the interview, and what kind of statement was made in the court.

In addition, it is also necessary to comprehensively review the contents of the statement in one prosecutor's office, such as the consistency and clearness, the contents of the statement, whether the contents are abundant, whether there is a characteristic description of the case, stolen and perpetrator, and whether it includes information of a standardized case or more.

And this is the mental or social age of intellectual disability.

arrow