The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

20,900,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

1. The punishment of the court below (the penalty of October and 20,900,000 won) against the defendant against the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of this case requires strict punishment in light of the fact that the defendant is not a person handling narcotics but mediates the trade of psychotropic drugs and mediates solicitation in another person's criminal litigation even though he is not an attorney-at-law. Narcotics-related crimes are highly harmful to society and have a high risk of recidivism; the defendant has already been sentenced several times as a drug crime; the defendant has a record of having been sentenced several times as a repeated crime due to narcotics crime; the defendant has not been aware of the fact that he committed the crime in this case; the defendant has a high risk of repeating the crime; and the amount of the Metetetepis who arranged the sale and purchase of this case is not much significant; however, the defendant is against all of the crimes in this case; the defendant is sentenced to strict punishment; the defendant is sentenced to a confession of all of the crimes in this case from around May 9, 2012 to the extent that the defendant is not an attorney-at-law; the defendant has to be sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for the above two years, and the defendant's age and circumstances after the following the judgment of unfair sentencing.

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the court below is reversed in accordance with Article 364(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act as the defendant's appeal is with merit, and the following judgment is rendered again after pleading.

Criminal facts

The summary of the facts charged and the summary of the evidence recognized by the court are the facts charged and the gist of the evidence.