The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. In a case where there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared to the judgment of the first instance court, and the sentencing of the first instance court does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect them. Although the sentence of the first instance falls within the reasonable scope of discretion, it is desirable to reverse the judgment of the first instance court solely on the ground that it is somewhat different from the opinion of the appellate court, and to refrain from imposing a sentence that does not differ from

(See Supreme Court en banc Decision 2015Do3260 Decided July 23, 2015). According to the foregoing legal doctrine, the instant crime is deemed to drive a vehicle under the influence of alcohol despite the fact that the Defendant had been punished three times due to the crime of the Road Traffic Act (including the suspension of the execution of imprisonment with prison labor) including the suspension of the execution of imprisonment, and it is inevitable to strictly punish the Defendant on the basis of the Defendant’s state of alcohol (0.141% of blood alcohol concentration) and the circumstances leading to the traffic accident due to such a drunk driving.

Although there are circumstances agreed with the victim of the traffic accident at the time of the trial, it is difficult to view that a new sentencing data to a significant degree has been submitted in light of the content of the crime in this case.

In the end, there is no substantial change in the conditions of sentencing compared to the original judgment. In full view of all the reasons for sentencing as shown in the records and arguments of this case, the lower court’s punishment is too large and is not recognized to have exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.