A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] On January 12, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor and four years of suspension of execution on July 11, 2017 at the Dong Branch District Court of Seoul for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud) and the judgment was finalized on July 11, 2017.

[2] The Defendant, who is engaged in manufacturing, importing, or selling golf products in the construction works of Hong bean, has maintained the business by borrowing money from customers or selling goods on credit under the bad credit standing. The Defendant, in the name of “C”, was aware of the victim D who imported or sold golf products from the late 190s and about about 20 years from the late 1990s. On February 25, 2015, the Defendant contacted the victim to the E’s office around February 25, 2015 and sold “10,000 won for the FF golf wing wing 10,000 won for each purchase to GH.

“A false representation was made.”

However, even if the Defendant sold the proceeds to H, he did not have the intent or ability to pay the proceeds to the victim, and was thought to repay the proceeds to the golf wing wing practice machine to receive the demand for repayment from H.

Nevertheless, around that time, the Defendant acquired 100 FM wing 20 million won from the injured party and acquired 10 million FM wing 20.

2. On July 2015, the Defendant: (a) received samples from the injured party who was found in order to urge the payment of the sales proceeds as stated in paragraph (1) from the Chinese shower to the Chinese Republic of China; and (b) sold cosmetics to the injured party, which was sold by the injured party’s land manager; and (c) sold cosmetics to the injured party, if the injured party sent them to China, because he/she is possible to sell cosmetics in China and received orders for cosmetics.

At the time of arrival of goods in China, it is immediately possible to pay the price, and even though there are two sides, this was made a false statement as "I would like to know about whether to pay the price first."

However, the defendant sells cosmetics even if he sells them.