The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for a period of three and a half years.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., e., g., e., g., imprisonment without prison labor) of the lower court is deemed to be too unhued and unfair.

2. The Defendant, as a youth of the 20th century, has no previous convictions, and all of the instant crimes are recognized and are in profoundly against the Defendant.

However, the crime of this case is very heavy when the defendant conceals two victims of traffic accidents, and five victims, including three children, were injured by five children, and the crime of this case is very heavy.

The Defendant, as an instructor of a sports club, was obligated to actively protect victimized children who were on board the sports club and were staying home on board the sports club, but did not cause any enormous damage caused by gross negligence in violation of the signal, which exceeds 5 km/h or above the restricted speed and caused considerable damage.

The bereaved family members of the hidden child cannot lifelongly slick the slicker's slicker's slicker's slicker's slicker's slicker's slicker's slicker's slickt.

Nevertheless, the defendant did not receive a letter of suspicion from the victims except one victim who was injured until the trial of the case, and the victims strongly want to be punished by the defendant.

In order to prevent the recurrence of safety incidents of children's school drivers, such as the defendant, a national consensus is formed, and it is inevitable to punish the defendant from a general preventive point of view of punishment for preventing the recurrence of such accidents.

In full view of the above circumstances, the Defendant’s age, character, conduct and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is somewhat weak.

3. The lower judgment is reversed in accordance with Article 364(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act, on the grounds that the appeal by the prosecutor is reasonable.