The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (4 million won in penalty) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination is recognized as follows: (a) the Defendant recognized the instant crime and reflects the Defendant; (b) there is no previous conviction in addition to fines; (c) the degree of injury to the victims of the traffic accident is relatively minor; and (d) the driving vehicle is covered by

However, the Defendant committed the instant crime by causing a traffic accident while driving alcohol.

The number of victims of traffic accidents has reached three, and the defendant did not receive a letter from the victims.

In full view of the above circumstances and other conditions of sentencing indicated in the records, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, background leading to the commission of the crime, circumstances after the commission of the crime, etc., and the fact that it is reasonable to respect the sentencing of the first instance court where there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared with the first instance court, and where the sentencing of the first instance does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion (see Supreme Court Decision 2015Do3260 Decided July 23, 2015), etc., the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.