beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for a year and six months, for a year of imprisonment for a defendant B, for a year of imprisonment for a defendant C, for a period of ten months and for a defendant D.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
D From April 15, 2012 to July 2, 2013, the victim (owner)G is the head of the site “ID reinforced concrete construction work located in Gyeongjin-gun, Gyeongjin-gun,” the defendant A is the head of the above construction’s official duties from April 15, 2012 to July 2, 2013, and the defendant B is the deputy head of the above construction’s site from August 30, 2013 to November 30, 2013, respectively, and the person engaged in various requests for contracts and process management related to the said construction, and verification of theness to the subcontractor.
Defendant
C From June 2012, from around June 2012, C is the head of the Working Group on the Iron Work of the said Corporation, while J from June 2012, from around June 2012, it is a person who has been engaged in the work of the Working Group on the Iron Work of the said Corporation as a general manager of the said Working Group.
1. Defendants D, A, and B’s occupational breach of trust committed an act in collusion to deduct funds of the victim company by appropriating the construction cost without the consent of the victim company in order to use the funds in mind or for personal use. From June 15, 2012, the above office at the construction site office around the above construction site office around June 15, 2012, despite there were occupational duties to claim and disburse funds to the victim company as stated in the actual supply of materials, the victim company violates its duties. As such, the victim company falsely prepares documents as if it received materials more than the actual supply of the materials from the K company, which is the materials supplier company at the above construction site, and falsely prepares documents as if it received materials more than KRW 3,00,000 from the above construction site office, and caused the victim company to pay them more than KRW 3,000,000 to the K company and obtain pecuniary benefits equivalent to the same amount and damage to the victim company from that time to June 21, 2013.