1. The Defendant’s KRW 13,826,919 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from December 29, 2015 to November 29, 2016, and the following.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On October 4, 2015, around 21:25, the Defendant: (a) deemed that the Plaintiff was fluoring D in front of the Seocheon-si, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-si, the Plaintiff was fluoring the waste bags containing an empty disease; and (b) determined that the Plaintiff was fluoring the bags containing an empty disease into the Defendant, and that the Plaintiff was fluoring the bags containing an empty disease, and that the Plaintiff was fluoring the Defendant, and the Plaintiff was fluoring the Defendant, and the Defendant was fluoring the victim’s face.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). (b)

The plaintiff suffered injury from the accident of this case, resulting in the injury of the satise satise, satise satise.

[Grounds for Recognition: Facts without dispute, entries in Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 5, 10, 11 (including each number in the case with a serial number), images, and the purport of the whole pleadings]

2. Occurrence of and limitation on liability for damages;

A. The accident of this case occurred due to the Defendant's assault against the Plaintiff's arms, and thus, the Defendant is liable to compensate for the damages suffered by the Plaintiff due to the accident of this case.

B. However, while the defendant mispercing that the plaintiff would have dumped waste and making a trial cost between the plaintiff and the plaintiff, he was pushed ahead of the bags containing an empty disease, and the accident in this case appears to have occurred, and there is no intention to inflict an injury on the defendant to the defendant (in criminal cases against the defendant [the defendant's criminal case against the defendant [the defendant's bodily injury caused by assaulting the defendant], the defendant's liability is limited to 80% in terms of the fair apportionment of damage, taking into account the circumstances leading up to the accident in this case, such as the defendant's criminal case against the defendant (the defendant's bodily injury caused by assaulting the defendant).

다. 이에 대하여 피고는 원고가 병이 든 봉투를 휘둘렀고 이를 방어하기 위한 피고의 팔에 봉투가 맞은 후 튕겨나가면서 원고가 상해를 입었다고 주장하나, 을 제2 내지 4호증의 각 기재만으로는 앞서 인정한 사실을 뒤집고...