beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
One-person, one-person, one-time, and another-person, who is in China, speaks that they will give a loan to many and unspecified domestic people by telephone at the call center in China, and that is, the member of the telephone finance fraud (one-time, one-time, one-time, one-time, one-time, one-time, one-time, one-time, one-way, and the defendant conspireds with the above-mentioned D, etc. to act as a member of the telephone finance fraud (one-time, one-way, one-way, one-way) organization that receives the amount of damage from victims and
1. On January 2, 2017, the non-member of the organization in charge of fraud against the victim E makes a false statement to the effect that “In spite of the absence of the intent or ability to make a loan to the victim at a low interest rate, the victim E makes a loan from the agricultural cooperative, and in order to obtain the above loan, it is necessary to draw up transaction records and make a balance. Therefore, the victim makes a transfer of money from the F F’s corporate bank account (Account Number G) to the above F’s corporate bank account, and the above account holder in the name of the above account shall have the victim make a transfer of KRW 15.7 million to the above F’s corporate bank account, and around 11:40 on the same day, F withdrawn the above money from the corporate Kim Jong-dong branch in Kim Jong-dong and deliver it to the defendant, and the defendant received the money from the above national bank account holder at 1:40 on the same day less the fee from the above national bank account in the name of Kim Jong-dong and the above national bank account holder at 3:0 on the same day.
Accordingly, the Defendant, in collusion with the above victims of the above D et al., received money from the victims by deceiving them as above.
2. On January 2, 2017, a person who was incompacted with the victim J does not have the intent or ability to allow the victim to borrow a loan.