logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.11.19 2019누42596
체류자격변경 불허결정처분 취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the plaintiff at the court of first instance is not significantly different from that of the court of first instance, and even if the evidence submitted at the court of first instance is re-examined, the judgment of the court of first instance that rejected the plaintiff'

Therefore, the reasoning for the court’s explanation on this case is as follows: “this court” in the second 3-Class 4 of the second 3 of the judgment of the first instance is “the first instance court”; “Evidence 3” in the fourth 6 of the fourth 6 is “Evidence 1 through 3”; “Labor Welfare Corporation” in the fifth 8 is “Labor Welfare Corporation” in the fifth 8th 5th 5th 13 December 2018; and it is identical to the reasoning of the first 5th 20 and the second 1st 5th 5th 20. Thus, it is cited as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act; and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

C. “On the other hand, the Plaintiff submitted the “written receipt of a written request for reexamination” containing the purport that the Plaintiff received the written request for reexamination to the Busan Regional Headquarters of Korea Labor Welfare Corporation on June 24, 2019 after the closing of argument in the trial, but the illegality of administrative disposition in the administrative litigation should be determined on the basis of the law and fact state at the time of the administrative disposition, and the illegality of administrative disposition should be determined on the basis of the law and fact state at the time of the administrative disposition, and it does not have any effect upon the amendment or repeal of the law or change of fact state after the disposition was made. Therefore, in the instant lawsuit seeking the revocation of the disposition of refusal of

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case shall be dismissed as it is without merit. Since the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow