logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2013.04.26 2013고단526
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 2012, the Defendant committed the crime against the victim B: (a) at the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government coffee shop, the Defendant agreed to provide the victim B with “E” in cooperation with F, and (b) that the amount of investment is required to be loaned KRW 70,000,000 to the victim B.”

On May 7, 2012, the Defendant provided a security for a real estate lease contract of KRW 150 million on the 14th floor of the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G building 14th floor, which was leased by the said F, to the victim B, and received KRW 35 million from B, and around May 10, 2012, the Defendant borrowed KRW 70 million from B and received a notarized money loan contract of KRW 30,90,000 from B on the same day.

However, at the time of borrowing money from B, it was practically impossible for the Defendant to acquire and operate the “E” acquisition fund due to lack of money, and there was no permission from F to provide the lease deposit for the said real estate as security, and to jointly and severally guarantee the above 70 million loan obligation. It was thought that the Defendant used the money borrowed from B to pay the Defendant’s personal debt, etc.

Accordingly, the defendant deceptioned the victim B and acquired 65.9 million won from the Dong.

2. Crimes related to the victim F;

A. On May 7, 2012, the Defendant wishes to verify whether the F’s seal impression design affixed to the “E” investors and E business establishment lease agreement is fake to the victim before the “E” main points of the F’s operation of the victim F in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu.

In order to change the certificate of seal imprint and the certificate of seal imprint, the victim F is issued with the certificate of seal imprint and the certificate of seal imprint.

However, in fact, the defendant received a certificate of personal seal impression from the victim, and 70 million won against the defendant B, such as Paragraph 1.

arrow