Defendant

A's imprisonment with prison labor for 4 months for a crime of 2014 senior group 1239 and a crime of 2014 senior group 1828 (1).

Punishment of the crime

On February 21, 2011, Defendant A was sentenced to a two-year suspended sentence of imprisonment for a crime of fraud at the Seoul Southern District Court on March 1, 201, and the judgment became final and conclusive on March 1, 201. On June 19, 2013, Defendant A was sentenced to a two-year suspended sentence of imprisonment for ten months for the same court (each crime from September 201 to July 12, 201) and became final and conclusive on June 27, 2013. On April 2, 2014, Defendant A was sentenced to a one-year suspended sentence of imprisonment for five months at the same court (the same court on September 27, 2012) and became final and conclusive on April 10, 2014.

Criminal facts

"2014 Highest 1239": Defendant A is a person delegated from March 20, 2008 to take charge of implementing reconstruction and improvement projects by F, the president of the Gyeonggi-do E apartment reconstruction association in Busan, Young-gu.

On June 1, 2010, the Defendant stated that “The removal work may be done immediately to reconstruct E- Apartments located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and the removal work may be performed, and the removal work may be performed, and the cost may be subsidized because it will bring the scrap metal from the process of construction.”

However, at the time, the above E Apartment area was selected as a new town development area in Busan City, and the defendant and the above F apartment reconstruction construction could be delayed due to the delay in reconstruction of the above F apartment, which was being promoted by establishing a reconstruction association individually due to disputes between Busan and the above E apartment residents, and the defendant did not have the ability to immediately allow the victim to remove the E apartment area unless approval is obtained from the victim, even if the victim received financial support from Busan City.

Nevertheless, without notifying the victim of the fact that the construction is delayed, the defendant deceivings the victim without notifying the victim of the fact that the construction is delayed, and that deceivings the victim, which is the sum of KRW 15 million, in total, for the reconstruction construction expenses, etc. of the above E-House seven times, such as the statement in