Text
Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.
Reasons
Criminal facts
The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a C Poter cargo vehicle.
On October 1, 2016, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 05:35, and proceeded to the boundary of the scamb from the middle school which allowed the intersection of the private distance in the range of the scam in the range of the scam Kim Jong-dong at the time of the scambling of the scam.
In this case, there was a duty of care to check whether a person engaged in driving service has a way to reduce speed and to check the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right are well and to drive safely.
Nevertheless, by negligence, the defendant neglected this, received the right side part of the victim D (82) crossing the bicycle from the left side of the running direction of the defendant vehicle to the right side of the defendant vehicle.
After all, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim due to the above occupational negligence, such as the pelle between the lavae and the lavae of the lavae of the lavae, the lavae of the lavae of the lavae, the lavae of the lavae of the lavae, the lavae of the lavae, the
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Fact-finding survey report and report on the occurrence of any traffic accident;
1. The screen of photographs and on-site CCTV images;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;
1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the Selection of Punishment, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, grounds for sentencing of imprisonment without prison labor or heavier punishment;
1. A person who is in the basic area (from April to one year) special mitigation (aggravating) in the basic area (from April) of the type of general traffic accident subject to the sentencing guidelines: Where the victim has been negligent by considerable negligence in the occurrence of traffic accidents or the expansion of damage;
2. Circumstances favorable to the accused shall be as follows:
The defendant is deeply divided into and reflected in the crime of this case.
The fault of the victim who dried the crosswalk without getting off from the bicycle is also deemed to have caused the instant accident.