1. Upon the claim that was changed in exchange in this court, the Defendant limited to the Plaintiff on May 28, 2018.

1. The grounds for the court’s explanation concerning the instant case, such as accepting the judgment of the court of first instance, are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance (including the relevant part in the judgment of the court of first instance, but excluding the part on March 2, 200), and therefore, they are cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Following the second two pages of the amendment, “The above criminal case is pending in the appellate court as the Suwon District Court 2017No9113 at present, by filing an appeal.” The appellate court rendered a judgment dismissing the prosecutor’s appeal on May 18, 2018 (U.S. District Court 2017No9113). The prosecutor filed an appeal and filed an appeal and the case is pending in the appellate court as the Supreme Court 2018Do8773 at present.”

6 to 7 hereinafter referred to as the “instant disposition”) shall be deleted from the two pages.

2 The following shall be added to the 6th below:

A person shall be appointed.

E. On May 28, 2018, when the instant case was pending in this court, the Defendant issued a disposition to extend the period of prohibition of departure from May 27, 2018 to November 26, 2018 (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

Under 2, “The first instance court” means “The first instance court. The second instance court’s “The second instance court” means “The 7th instance court”. The third second instance court means “Evidence A 4, 5, and 6 of the 7th instance court” and “The fourth and the fourth instance court’s “not later than the date the judgment of innocence is pronounced” means “not later than the date the judgment of innocence is pronounced in the first instance and the subsequent appellate court’s appeal is pronounced.” Under 4, the fourth instance court deemed “not later than the date the judgment of innocence is pronounced in the first instance court and the subsequent appellate court’s appeal is declared.” The fifth and second instance court’s “for about nine months from the first instance court to the nine months from the appellate court, and for about five months from the appellate court to the appellate court.”

3. Accordingly, the instant disposition is unlawful.