A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

On June 28, 2011, the Defendant sentenced ten months to imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Daegu District Court on the Daegu District Court on January 21, 201, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Daegu Prison on January 21, 2012.

1. The Defendant: (a) around December 15, 2014, at a mutually influent restaurant located in the Seo-gu, Daegu-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu (Seoul-gu); (b) the victim C saying, “Fag is too old; (c) gold fags are fags are too old; and (d) several persons are placed in the inner dong; (c) the bag, egs, and egs are left to B, in a new form.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not operate a gold bank or have detailed technology, and he thought that he will dispose of precious metals and use it as a living cost, so even if he was delivered precious metals from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to change it into a new type.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received from the victim a total sum of 3 million won from the victim, one gold-macks, one gold-macks, two gold-hacks, and two gold-macks, and from around that time to May 11, 2015, the Defendant received precious metals worth KRW 9,110,000,000 from the victims, in total, six times from that time, as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Table.

2. Crimes of defraudation of cash;

A. On February 2015, the Defendant: (a) around February 2015, at a mutual influent restaurant located in the Seo-gu, Daegu-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu (Seoul-gu); (b) the Defendant stated that the said victim C would pay KRW 1 million one million after two days if the Defendant loaned money to the Defendant, as the amount of money to be 8 million won is insufficient to cover the money while operating the gold bank and selling it again to the fluent with the gold flus.

However, in fact, the defendant did not operate a bank, was living in a old-age without a certain occupation or residence, and was thought to use the borrowed money as a living cost, so there was no intention or ability to pay the borrowed money even if he borrowed money from the victim.

The defendant deceivings the victim to do so.