1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On June 24, 2003, the Plaintiff continued to renew the term of the contract since the lease of real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant rental housing”) that is a public construction rental house to the Defendant. However, on September 1, 2015, the Plaintiff concluded a lease agreement (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”) to renew the term of the contract by August 31, 2017.

3. Where a lessee has committed an act falling under any of the following subparagraphs, the lessor may cancel or terminate this contract, or refuse to renew the lease contract:

7. Where the "Lessee" or a person who belongs to such household owns another house or occupies another house by winning it in another house during the lease period of public construction constructed with the approval of the project plan pursuant to the provisions of Article 16 of the Housing Construction Promotion Act: Provided, That this shall not apply where he/she disposes of the relevant house within six months from the date he/she is notified of the disqualified as a result of computer search by holding another house due to inheritance, judgment, marriage, or other unavoidable reasons, and where he/she acquires the right of lease on a first-come-first-served basis in accordance with the rules on housing supply at the time

B. The following provisions are stipulated in the lease contract prepared at the time of the conclusion of the above lease contract:

C. On August 27, 2015, the Defendant submitted a written pledge stating that “A spouse including the principal and a member of the household have no ownership of the house, and if it is found as a result of the computerized search on the current status of ownership of the house in the future that the winning has been different from the qualifications for subscription to house and the order, the Defendant entered the wife B and C in the current status column of the members of the household of the said written pledge.”

On November 27, 2015, the Plaintiff is the case in which C is not more than 40.20 square meters of a single-story house from Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D ground and sapmentment and coapment.