logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2019.05.15 2018고단2205
강제추행
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 20:20 on September 12, 2018, the Defendant: (a) considered a mobile phone on the street in front of the convenience store in the front of the front of the front city of 2018, and took place the victim D (the age of 58) who returned home, and was able to make indecent act by force; (b) the victim is "hicked, bad," and the victim is "hicked, bad," and (c) rhumd the chest of the victim; and (d) rhumd the victim’s body with the victim who escaped at the convenience store in the middle of the victim’s body, and became the victim’s hand by pushing the victim’s body.

Accordingly, the Defendant committed an indecent act on the part of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Investigation report (related to telephone conversations of witnesses);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photograph by attaching a report of investigation (related to field CCTV attachment);

1. Article 298 of the Criminal Act and Article 298 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 16 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Committed;

1. Where a conviction on a sex crime subject to registration becomes final and conclusive in the judgment, which constitutes a sex crime subject to registration, under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the defendant is a person subject to registration of personal information under Article 42(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes, and the defendant is obligated to submit personal information to a competent agency under

For the Defendant exempted from the disclosure order, notification order, and employment restriction order, the personal information of the Defendant appears to have the effect of preventing re-offending even after completing the registration of personal information and the sexual assault treatment program. In addition, considering the Defendant’s age, occupation, content and motive of the crime, method and seriousness of the crime, disclosure order, notification order, social benefits expected by the employment restriction order, and the effectiveness expected by the disclosure order, the disadvantage and anticipated side effects of the Defendant, the personal information of the Defendant.

arrow