logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2014.10.17 2014나455
채무부존재확인
Text

1. Revocation of the first instance judgment.

The instant lawsuit is dismissed.

2. All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation on this part of the basic facts is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except for deletion or modification as follows. Thus, this part is cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The second 3th of the judgment of the first instance court shall be deleted, and the second 3th of the judgment of the first instance shall be amended to paragraphs (b) through (c), and the second 3th of the above 12th of the above 12th of the above 'D' contract of the same C Business Office (hereinafter referred to as the 'C Business Office contract of this case', 'the first business Office contract of this case'.

"The change shall be made".

2. Whether the lawsuit of this case is lawful

A. On May 6, 2011, the Plaintiff asserted that the instant secondary business establishment agreement was concluded with the Defendant (hereinafter “instant secondary business establishment agreement”) and subsequently confirmed the absence of the obligation under the instant secondary business establishment agreement on the ground that the instant secondary business establishment agreement was concluded twice and the said secondary business establishment agreement was null and void, as well as that the Plaintiff did not actually operate C business establishment.

The defendant asserts that the plaintiff's lawsuit of this case is unlawful because there is no benefit of confirmation.

B. Fact-finding 1) The fact that the Plaintiff and the Defendant entered into the second place of business agreement, the main contents of which consisting of the following parts as of May 6, 201, in the name of the Plaintiff and the Defendant, does not conflict between the parties. The term of the contract under Article 3 (Contract Period) is from May 15, 201 to May 14, 2012. The term of the contract under Article 3 (Contract Period) is from May 15, 201 to May 14, 2012. The term of the contract expires,

(1) In the absence of an objection, the contract shall be extended. (2) In the absence of an objection to Article 4 (Scope of Business) (1) A (hereinafter referred to as the “Plaintiff,”

The scope of this business shall be determined by ordinary standards for car rental, but shall be determined by mutual consultation with the defendant when a special situation occurs.

(2) The plaintiff and the defendant shall be liable for damage to the company between themselves.

arrow