1. Defendant B is the Suwon District Court with respect to 1,653 square meters of forests and fields D in Gwangju City from the Plaintiff (Appointeds) and the appointed parties.

1. Basic facts

가. 원고 및 선정자들은 가족들의 묏자리를 구하던 중 공인중개사인 E, F 등의 중개로 2012. 4. 26. 피고 B의 남편이자 대리인인 피고 C로부터 피고 B 소유의 광주시 D 임야 1,653㎡(이하 ‘이 사건 임야’라 한다)를 매수하였다

(hereinafter “instant sales contract”). B.

The Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the appointed parties are as follows: Defendant C the down payment of KRW 5,000,000 for the instant sales contract on April 26, 2012; and

5. After paying each of the remaining KRW 45,000,000 on July 5, 2012, the Court Gwangju registry office completed the registration of ownership transfer of each of the shares in the instant forest at issue, No. 43740 on July 5, 2012.

다. 그러나 이 사건 임야는 산비탈에 위치하고 있어 묏자리로 사용하기에 어려운 곳이었고, 이에 원고는 2013. 12. 10. 피고들을 사기로 고소하였다. 라.

However, on June 27, 2014, the branch office of the Suwon District Prosecutors' Office rendered a non-prosecution disposition against the Defendants on the charge of each of the charges (Evidence of Evidence) (No. 10232, 2014), and the Plaintiff filed an appeal, and the Seoul High Prosecutors' Office filed an appeal.

8. 8. The appeal against Defendant B is dismissed, and the defendant C was ordered to re-examine the case.

(Seoul High Prosecutor's Office No. 8551), Seoul High Prosecutor's Office (Seoul High Prosecutor's Office No. 201).

그 후 피고 C은 2014. 12. 15. '피고 C은 2012. 4. 26. 이 사건 임야와 인접한 토지가 매매목적물인 것처럼 행세하면서 “이 사건 임야는 가족 묏자리로 좋은 명당이다. 내가 죽으면 묏자리로 쓰려고 했는데 선산으로 가게 되어 땅을 판다.”라고 말하였다.

However, the forest of this case is not usable as a cemetery, and there was no intention or ability to sell the forest that can be created as a cemetery even if the plaintiff and the selected parties receive the purchase money from the plaintiff and the selected parties.

Nevertheless, the defendant C, as such, deceiving the plaintiff and the designated parties, and its appurtenances, shall be the down payment from the plaintiff and the designated parties.