A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2012. 9. 9. 23:30경부터 2012. 9. 10. 00:30경까지 사이에 전주시 덕진구 C파출소 사무실에서, 피고인이 D을 폭행한 사건에 관하여 조사를 받던 중, D 등 4~5명이 듣고 있는 가운데 위 파출소 소속 경찰관인 피해자 E에게 “이 자식아 근무태도가 좋은 지 보자, 나쁜 놈의 자식아, 니가 경찰서로 날 보내려고 해, 행실 똑바로 혀, 야 이 개자식아, 이 후리 자식아, 나 어떻게 혀 내가 덕진경찰서로 가면 돼 그 서류 이리 가져와 내가 사인해줄께 새끼야”라고 욕설을 하면서 피해자 E의 얼굴에 침을 뱉으려 하고, 옆에서 욕설을 하지 말 것을 요구하던 같은 파출소 소속 경찰관인 피해자 F에게 “좃 같은 소리하네, 씨발놈”이라고 욕설을 하는 등 공연히 피해자들을 모욕하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D, E, and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the written complaint of E and F;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 311 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. From among concurrent offenders, the crime of this case was committed by the police officers who are performing official duties under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act, and the nature of the crime is not good. In light of the fact that around 2009, the defendant was sentenced to a fine for obstruction of performance of official duties, a fine for insult to police officers, a suspended sentence due to obstruction of performance of official duties, and a suspended sentence for obstruction of performance of official duties, and even if there was a record of being sentenced twice again to a fine for insult to police officers on around 201 and around 2012, the defendant again committed the crime of this case and did not make efforts to reach agreement with the victims, the defendant shall be sentenced to the punishment against the defendant.

However, the fact that the defendant is led to the confession and reflect of the crime, the fact that the defendant committed a contingent crime under the influence of alcohol, and the age, character and conduct, family relationship, family environment, motive and means of the crime, and after the crime.