The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

On March 22, 2016, the Defendant is the head of the management department as D at the meeting room of the representative of the occupants of the Seo-gu Incheon Metropolitan Government apartment building on March 22, 2016, in which 11 representative, 35 visitors, etc. are heard.

It is an option to see our house with eight people who are on behalf of one another.

This is not a chief of conduct but a chief of conduct.

“.........” and “............

D I, as soon as possible, do do her friende of the Central Central Republic of Korea.

“I,” and “I, by its employees, quality A.

"," and "accomage of intimidation."

A. The term "Intimidation A.I. test" and "D. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. E. S. S. S. S

“.....”

However, the victim D(46) was merely the chief of the management office belonging to the above apartment management office, and there was no attack or threat against the defendant by joining a large number of people, such as organized violence, and there was no fact that there was no threat to the life or body of the defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Investigation report (as to the attachment of video CDs submitted by the complainant D);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to recording files;

1. Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 307 (2) of the choice of punishment;

1. A fine not exceeding 500,000 won to be suspended;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Sentence (a) of the Korean Criminal Code (the fact that the defendant has no criminal history, and the defendant's above exaggerated statement is recognized as infringing on the victim's reputation, but this is a relatively wide range of freedom of expression in light of the place, qualification, etc. of the defendant as a member of the meeting at the meeting of the occupants' representative meeting.