1. The plaintiff (appointed party)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff (Appointed Party).

1. The grounds for this court’s explanation, such as accepting the judgment of the court of first instance, are as follows, and the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance is used as follows, and as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for adding “judgments on the plaintiff’s assertion” as stated in the following 2. Thus, it is acceptable as it is in accordance with the main sentence of

From 2, up to 3 pages 1 to 2, the previous ENono Association was authorized to divide into ENono Association and Dnono Association, and the separate committee was established and implemented as follows. The 3rd 1st 2nd 3rd 3rd 3rd 3rd 3rd 3rd 5th 5th 5th 5th 200 (Seoul Southern District Court 2012 Gano161) was amended as “(Seoul Southern Southern District Court 2012 Gano94)” to “(Seoul Southern District Court 2012 Gano94)” and “Ch 15th 10 10th 25th 17th 207,” each of the 5th 1st 2nd 1st 3rd 5th 1st 1st 2016.

2. Judgment on the plaintiff's assertion in this court

A. Regarding the assertion that the interests of confirmation should be actively recognized for dispute resolution, the plaintiff asserts that when considering the vertical distribution of the members in conflict with the process of dispute resolution inside the C church, the resolution according to the procedures of the defendant religious order constitution shall be possible, while the same conflict with the similar dispute shall be repeated if the resolution by the court's decision is not finalized, since the court's decision should actively recognize the interests of confirmation and make a decision on the confirmation of the C church's association.

As seen earlier.