logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.11.28 2017가단516403
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 43,545,00 with respect to the Plaintiff and the period from September 16, 2015 to November 28, 2017.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is a company that manufactures agricultural-related water supply materials, such as a beter, a beer, and a quantitative cultivation machine, and sells them all over the country.

B. From March 25, 2013 to May 10, 2014, Defendant A was in charge of the Category D business to control a liquid cultivation machine from the business division of the Plaintiff Company from March 25, 2013 to May 10, 2014. E was in charge of the promotion, sale, and distribution of products, such as a liquid cultivation machine in the region, agricultural distribution pipe, etc., even before the Plaintiff Company’s business member from April 1, 2012 to July 7, 2015.

C. Defendant A and E, while employed at the time of their employment and even after their retirement, signed the Plaintiff Company’s products similar to those produced by the Plaintiff Company across or across the country without being employed by the Plaintiff Company for two years, or without being employed by the company for such purposes. Article 18 of the Rules of Employment of the Plaintiff Company provides that “An employee shall not comply with the employment of any other company or engage in any other business contrary to the interests of the company,” and Article 56(1)9 of the Rules of the Plaintiff Company provides that “A person who has been engaged in any other business contrary to the interests of the company” shall be subject to disciplinary action.

AB established this chapter.

On the other hand, F, who was the representative director of the defendant company, resigned on December 19, 2014, and on the same day, the defendant A was registered as an in-house director and became the representative of the defendant company.

e.F is entirely written with respect to the technology related to the manufacture of a liquid cultivation machine, and both a liquid cultivation machine produced by the Defendant Company was produced entirely by Defendant A if F pays machinery production costs to Defendant A.

F. Defendant A served in the Plaintiff Company.

arrow