A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates a rest room, which is a commercial sex trade business establishment, under the trade name of "C" in 803 and 807, Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City Btel.

1. Violation of the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts;

A. From September 1, 2014 to November 19:57 of the same month, the Defendant employed the said “C” resting women from two rooms, including D, and arranged the sexual traffic by acquiring profits of KRW 100,000 per day by allowing the women to have sexual intercourse with the customers, on condition that the Defendant received KRW 30,000 won for 30,000 won for 50,000 won for 30,000 won for 50,000 won for 30,000 won for 50,000 won for 30,000 won for 50,000 won for 50,000

B. On September 15, 2014, around 20:35, the Defendant: (a) hired E who is a woman of sexual traffic; and (b) sought 30,000 won from F to receive 80,000 won, the Defendant assisted the said E to engage in sexual intercourse with F on condition that he/she would receive 50,000 won from F.

2. No person who violates the School Health Act shall operate any business establishment with access by or prohibition of employment of juveniles in a school sanitation and cleanup zone;

A. From September 1, 2014 to November 19:57 of the same month, the Defendant was equipped with the above “C” facilities, such as bathing rooms and beds, in an enclosed space as described in subparagraphs 803 and 807 through 1-a (a), and operated a business establishment that engages in sexual intercourse at a price.

B. On September 15, 2014, at around 20:35, the Defendant, a school sanitary cleanup zone, equipped with equipment such as bathing rooms and beds in an enclosed space, as described in subparagraphs 307 through 1-b, and operated a business establishment that engages in sexual intercourse for consideration.

As a result, the defendant operated a business establishment prohibiting juvenile access and employment in the school sanitation cleanup zone.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol against D, E, or F;

1. Each protocol of seizure;