The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The Defendant recognized and reflected the crime, and agreed with the victim of the traffic accident.

However, in a state of 0.240% alcohol concentration, the Defendant caused a traffic accident while driving a drinking without a license and driving without a license, thereby causing the victim's injury of eight weeks, resulting in another person's resident registration number, resulting in another person's resident registration number to the police dispatched to the scene for hiding a drunk driving, and signed and delivered the relevant documents, and thus, the nature of the crime is very good.

The defendant committed the crime of this case even though he was in the period of probation for committing the crime of traffic accident due to drinking driving.

In addition, considering the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means, consequence, etc. as shown in the records and pleadings, the sentence of the lower court is only within the reasonable scope of discretion, and it is difficult to view that it is unfair because it is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is not accepted.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.