Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be paid.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a representative director of D Co., Ltd.

On July 1, 2012, the Defendant concluded that, “The Defendant would pay the transportation charge on the 15th day of the following month to the victim I (the age of 49) who operates H Co., Ltd. at the D Office located in Yeonsu-gu Incheon Metropolitan City C302 by transporting the sand collected from the J Co., Ltd. from the J Co., Ltd. (the age of 49) from the J Co., Ltd. to the

However, in fact, the defendant had no intention or ability to pay the transport charges even if he did a sand transport work for the victim, as he did not pay the company's employees the total amount of the obligation, such as the loan and other transport charges, in the amount of KRW 450 million to KRW 50 million to KRW 50 million.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, had the victim transport sand from the date of the same month to the 5006 Rab on the date of the same month, and did not pay the amount equivalent to KRW 20,806,148, and the same year.

8. He did not pay transport charges equivalent to KRW 43,100,429 in total, such as transport charges of KRW 22,294,281, with the transport charges of KRW 43,100,429, which had sand transported 5324,000 on the date unexplosed and did not pay transport charges.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of a witness I;

1. Application of the prosecution examination protocol to the accused;

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act and the selection of fines for criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion of the defendant and defense counsel under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order asserts that the facts among the facts charged are acknowledged, but there was no intention to acquire them at the time.

According to the above evidence in the judgment, D Co., Ltd. operated by the defendant was not good from the beginning of 2012, and the defendant had already been liable for 400 million won at the time of entering into a sand transport contract with the victim, and the defendant thereafter.