A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 21, 2015, the Defendant: (a) driven a DMW car under the influence of alcohol at approximately 800 meters distance from the road front of the store in the vicinity of the Seo-gu Seocheon-dong Stungcheon-dong Stungcheon-dong Stungcheon-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju to the front road of the Gwangju Seo-gu, while under the influence of alcohol by 0.078% in blood alcohol concentration.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is a person engaging in driving a DMW car.

On February 21, 2015, the Defendant driving a car at around 02:41, and driving the car at around 02:41, along a four-lane intersection in front of the Seo-gu Seo-gu Seoul Building, along a four-lane road from the direction of the Hacheon Reservoir reservoir to the Geum-dong.

At the intersection, the left turn was made to the oil station.

Since there is an intersection where a signal, etc. is installed, there was a duty of care for a person engaged in driving motor vehicles to live well on the right and the right, and to safely drive the signal in compliance with the signal.

Nevertheless, even though the vehicle's progress signal was changed to a stop signal while under the influence of alcohol by neglecting it, the Defendant was found to have been on the right side of the car driving ahead of the F-si driven by the victim E (V, 50 years old) who was driving in the intersection in accordance with the straight line from the opposite side due to the negligence of disregarding it and left left.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim E in the course of performing such occupational negligence for approximately two weeks, such as sprinked salt spons, etc., and suffered injury to the taxi passengers G (19 years of age) by sprinking spons, tensions, etc. for about four weeks.

3. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (measures after Accidents) at the time and place specified in Paragraph 2, as stated in Paragraph 2, received the Defendant’s front penter portion of the car driving by driving the F taxi at the right side of the car, and thereby received the traffic control devices by pushing the said taxi.

Ultimately, the Defendant above.