logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전고등법원 2019.05.15 2018누12952
교원소청심사위원회결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff, including those resulting from participation.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court of the first instance’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the first instance judgment, except for the case as set forth in the following paragraph (2). Thus, this is cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the height between 15 and 3 pages 2 are as follows.

1. From 2014 to 2: The number of hours of 1: 1: 0-1: 30-10-14 of the class hours, the number of 1: 1: 0-14 of the class hours, the number of 1: 30-14 of the 10-14 of the 20-10-14 of the 20-14 of the 10-14 of the 20-1, the number of 1: 30-14 of the 10-14 of the 20-1, the number of 1: 0-14 of the 10-14 of the 20-1, the number of 10-14 of the 10-14 of the 20-1, the number of 10-1,000 of the 14-1,000 of the 14-1,015-2 of the 1,010-14 of the 1.

2. The intervenor handling false decision-making shall handle false decision-making with respect to the above unauthorized lecture subjects (168 times in total, 210 hours in total).

3. An intervenor who falsely presents his/her achievements shall submit a false report on his/her performance in the first semester of 2016, “A leader and a judge’s qualification certificate” as the result of guidance on non-credit education.

C. The teachers personnel committee of the C.S. shall conduct the above investigation.

arrow