Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. On May 3, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 15:20 on May 3, 2013, the summary of the facts charged in the instant case: (b) inside C-si driven by the victim B (the age of 54) in the direction of the home fluor, Changwon-si, Changwon-si; and (c) around the Gyeongnam-si, the Gyeongnam-si, the Gyeongwon-si, the Gyeongwon-si, the Gyeongwon-si, the Gyeongwon-si, the Gyeongnam-si, the Gyeongnam-si, the Gyeongnam-si, who was driven by the victim at his house, frequently taken the broke, leading the fluor; and (d) caused the fluora to the fluora, the fluor that the fluords did not promptly proceed to the right; and (d) assault the victim’s fluorian by driving the fluor.
2. Determination
(a) Crimes of non-compliance with an intention (Article 260 (3) of the Criminal Act);
(b) The victim is not subject to punishment after the indictment of this case.
(c) Judgment dismissing public prosecution (Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act);