logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2007. 05. 11. 선고 2007두4445 판결
명의신탁에 의한 조세회피목적이 있었는지 여부[국승]
Title

Whether there was the purpose of tax avoidance through the title trust

Summary

Since it is proved that there was no purpose of tax avoidance through the title trust, there is a nominal holder, so the deemed donation is legitimate because there is no evidence recognized as such.

Related statutes

Article 41-2 (Presumption of Donation of Title Trust Property)

Text

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

In comparison with the records of this case and the judgment of the court below, the allegation in the grounds of appeal cannot be accepted in accordance with Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 5 of the Act, and the costs of appeal are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

arrow