logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.12.18 2014나702
전세금 등
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. As a public corporation to determine the cause of the claim, the Plaintiff supported the pre-sale rental housing fund for the residential stability of university students: (a) on October 9, 2012, the Plaintiff entered into a contract between the Defendant and part of the second floor of Seodaemun-gu Seoul (hereinafter “instant housing”); (b) the lease period from October 23, 2012 to October 22, 2014; (c) the lease period is KRW 70,000,000; and (d) the lease period is KRW 1,00,000 among the lease amount is KRW 1,00,000,000 on October 9, 2012; (d) the Plaintiff did not have any special obligation to pay the remainder to the Defendant on October 23, 2012; and (e) the Plaintiff and the Defendant did not have any obligation to return the pre-sale housing to the Defendant under the above contract, and (e) the Plaintiff and the Defendant could no longer have agreed to return the remainder of the lease deposit to the Defendant 30.

2. Judgment on the defendant's defense

A. The defendant asserts that C is obliged to deduct the repair cost of KRW 903,00,00 (i.e., cost of repairing electric facilities, KRW 100,000) incurred as a result of the failure of C to properly manage the facility in this case, as well as the damage to electric installations, remote areas, etc. and the Defendant’s refusal to provide repair performance.

B. According to the records in Gap evidence No. 1, Article 4 (1) of the lease contract of this case (Housing Management, etc.) shall be applied.

arrow