1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation as to this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except for the following addition to the text of the judgment of the first instance. Thus, it shall be cited by Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The part 8 of the judgment of the court of first instance states that "No change in the price can be made" (excluding the part 6) and the following additional contents are added (the plaintiff can be sold at an appropriate price without any need to comply with the consumer sale price designated by the original trade, and thus, in fact, he did not bear a duty to comply with the price. However, as seen earlier, the obligation to comply with the consumer sale price under the contract of this case is stipulated in the contract of this case, while the plaintiff's sales commission is stipulated within a certain range of 23% to 33%, it can be said that the plaintiff could have been able to sell at an appropriate discount, etc., depending on the case within the scope of the sales commission. In fact, as seen below, the difference between the actual sales price and the plaintiff's payment for the original trade is within the scope of such sales commission, and therefore, the plaintiff did not comply with the obligation to comply with the contract of this case 10 if it is difficult for the plaintiff to view the goods supplier and the seller as a general seller or the seller as an agent, the seller bears the risks of this case 2.