1. The Defendant shall pay KRW 300,000 to the Plaintiff, as well as KRW 5% per annum from C to July 21, 2017, and from the next day.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff made a reply to conscientious objection in CMa-gu Seoul Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D, and on the same day, the Plaintiff’s said reply was reported along with the Plaintiff’s photograph, as the title “E” to the social copon of “E” following the Internet evasion.

나. 피고는 C 위 기사가 게시되자 “이런 쒸레기들 장난을 뭣땜시 기사화 하나. 도대체 원 ”이란 댓글을 작성하여 게시하였다.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 7 (including virtual number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts of recognition on the board, the Defendant posted a letter on the Internet website bulletin which enables an unspecified number of people to confirm the contents of the article and thereby insulting the Plaintiff’s social reputation. As such, the Defendant is obligated to compensate for mental suffering suffered by the Plaintiff.

The amount of consolation money shall be 300,000 won in full view of the contents and number of inquiries made and posted by the defendant, the background of writing comments made by the defendant, and various circumstances shown in the pleadings, such as the circumstances after the time.

Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff damages amounting to KRW 300,000 and damages for delay calculated at the rate of 5% per annum as stipulated by the Civil Act until July 21, 2017, which is the date of this decision, which is deemed reasonable to dispute the scope of the Defendant’s obligation to pay to the Plaintiff the damages amounting to KRW 300,000, and 15% per annum as stipulated by the Act on Special Cases Concerning Expedition, etc.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified within the scope of the above recognition, and the remaining claims are dismissed as they are without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.