logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2017.06.29 2017고정410
위증
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000 (three million).

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 12, 2016, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the Kug Government District Court No. 2015, 2327, Ji Government District Court No. 18, Ji Government District Court No. 16:40, May 12, 2016, which was in the Dong Dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-si, and made a good appearance, and there is no fact that the Defendant intended to do so in this way.

The testimony was made.

In fact, on March 26, 2015, the Defendant was waiting for the grandchildren coming from the C Private Teaching Institutes around 18:00, but D intended to remove the banner set up by the husband F of B, who was going to the above apartment 101 unit 101 unit 2, from the central passage of the Namyang-si, Namyang-si, the Defendant led the above D to the said six representative of the above apartment unit and the 30 unit 30 unit 2 of the apartment unit 201.

L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L.C.;

I take the lead of these years, so-called "pathos" is softened, and we can immediately see this year.

I tried to refer " to the large interest".

However, due to the personal relationship with B, the Defendant made a false testimony as above.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Protocols of public trial (11th page of investigation records), protocol of examination of witnesses (113th page of investigation records), recording notes (15th page of investigation records);

1. Written answers (Korean vehicle engineer of the C driving Institute), the attendance book ( March 2015), and the schedule of time for its members;

1. Application of the text of the judgment of the District Court 2016No. 1614, the District Court 2015, the District Court 2327, 2329 (Joint) and the text of the judgment of the District Court 2015;

1. Article 152 of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 152 (1) of the Criminal Act that selects a punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

1. The Defendant, on the grounds of sentencing of Article 186(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, continuously denied the crime of perjury in the instant case, and the judgment in the instant case (Supreme Court Decision 2015Da2327, 2329 (Consolidation) Decided June 23, 2016; Supreme Court Decision 2016No 1614 Decided September 20, 2016; Supreme Court Decision 201Da1616 Decided September 20, 2016).

arrow