logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.02.13 2016나78554
대여금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. As to the defendant B, while promoting nanotechnology-related business, the above defendant is obligated to pay the total of KRW 29.6 million as long as he borrowed 29.6 million from the plaintiff for the above business.

In relation to Defendant C, the Plaintiff wired money to Defendant C’s account, which is the children of Defendant B, and Defendant C concealeds property in the name of Defendant C, and pays Defendant C’s monthly pay with the Plaintiff’s loaned money, etc. As such, Defendant C was the maximum beneficiary of the instant loan, Defendant C was jointly and severally liable to pay the said KRW 29.6 million with Defendant B.

2. Determination

A. As a result of examining the Plaintiff’s grounds of appeal and the evidence submitted by the court of first instance regarding the Defendants, the court’s reasoning of the judgment of first instance was examined as to this case’s grounds of appeal, which are alleged by the Plaintiff as grounds of appeal.

Except as mentioned in paragraph (1), all of the judgment of the court of first instance are the same as the statement in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance.

B. 1) The part added to the part 1) at the end of 14th day of the 14th day of the 3th day of the judgment of the first instance, "(The above 11,977,940 won, which is the remainder after deducting the expenses spent at the above 29.6 million won from the expenses spent at the office" is added to the 11,97,940 won at the end of 14th day of the 14th day of the 14th day of the judgment of the first instance. (2) The plaintiff transferred money to the account of the defendant Eul as the son, and the defendant C transferred money to the defendant Eul as the son's children, and as long as the defendant Eul concealed the property in the name of the defendant Eul, the defendant C is jointly and severally liable for the loan of this case, but the above 3th day of the 19th day of the judgment of the first instance as the above 3th day of the appeal against the defendant C.

arrow